SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 192

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Vikram @ Vicky – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwajeet.
Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj.

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. These are two petitions i.e. CRM-M-27001 of 2020 and CRM-M-44247-2020 for grant of regular bail in case of FIR No. 113 dated 5.5.2020 under Section 379-A IPC, 1860 (Section 379-B, 411 and 120-B IPC 1860 were added later), registered at Police Station Kalayat District Kaithal, and FIR No. 49 dated 15.3.2020, under Section 379-A IPC 1860 (Section 411 IPC 1860 was added later) registered at Police Station Garhi District Jind.

2. The FIRs were at the behest of complainants who had suffered snatching incident. During investigation on the disclosure statement of Karampal and Anil, the name of the petitioner surfaced. It was stated that the petitioner who is engaged in the business of jewellery used to purchase the snatched ornaments.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and only recovery was of Rs. 3000/- and Rs. 500/- in each case was made. He argues that the story of recovery put forth is improbable. The petitioner is engaged in business and bound to have the small amount available with him. It is further argued that investigation is complete and no recovery is to be made.

4. Reply dated 22.3.2021 filed i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top