SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 15

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Jagmohan – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Aggarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kunal Dawar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Jagjot Singh, Mr. Dhruv Sheoran.

JUDGMENT :

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

1. Case heard via video conferencing.

2. By this revision petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the judgment and order of sentence dated 10.05.2019 and 13.05.2019 respectively, passed by the learned JMIC, Faridabad, as also the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad, dated 11.02.2021.

3. On 26.02.2021, the following order had been passed by this court, upon an application bearing CRM No. 5846 of 2021 having been filed on behalf of the petitioner:-

    “Case heard via video conferencing.

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner draws attention of this court to CRM-5846-2021, which is an application seeking that the offence may be allowed to be compounded even after conviction of the applicant-petitioner, in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, with the matter having been settled vide the settlement/compromise deed dated 19.02.2021 (copy Annexure P-1).

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Virk, D.A.G. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no. 2, with Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate, appearing and accepting notice on behalf of respondent no. 1.

He submits that he has a po

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top