SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI. J.
Ranjeet Kaur - Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents
CRWP-7785-2020 (O&M)
Decided on : 02-03-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant :Mr.Arun Takhi, Advocate
For The Respondent:Mr.Harpreet Singh Multani, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Harsh Chopra, Advocate

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - Writ for habeas corpus - Petition filed for release of minor girl married against parental wishes - The court emphasized the illegality of child marriage and protection of child's welfare. (Paras 5, 18, 39)

(B) Minor's consent - The court held that while the minor expressed a desire to live with her husband, her marital status does not confer legal rights against child marriage prohibitions. (Paras 27, 39)

(C) Locus Standi - The petitioner's standing to file habeas corpus was upheld, recognizing relaxed requirements for such petitions. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is the sister-in-law of Harpreet Singh, who married Neha, a minor, against her parents' wishes. The marriage violated child marriage laws as Neha was under 18 years. (Paras 2-4)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the marriage was voidable and emphasized that the welfare of a minor is paramount, given that Neha was not facing issues in the protection home. (Paras 39, 40)

Issues: The main issues centered around the legality of the marriage, minor consent, custody, and the applicability of child marriage laws.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that minor marriage lacks legal standing under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and upheld the minor's custody with the Child Protection Home for welfare considerations. (Paras 39, 40)

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petition for habeas corpus filed for neha's release. (Para 1 , 2)
2. prior court directions and fir against harpreet singh. (Para 3 , 4)
3. neha's interaction with the court confirmed her marriage. (Para 5 , 6)
4. petitioner's argument on neha's right to live with her husband. (Para 7 , 8)
5. state's position on child marriage and legal protections. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. legal precedents supporting child protection measures. (Para 13)
7. court's analysis of petitioner's locus standi. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. statutory provisions regarding child marriage. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
9. court's distinction of prior cases and judgments. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
10. implications of child marriage under various statutes. (Para 26 , 27 , 29)
11. child marriage deemed detrimental and a violation of rights. (Para 30 , 31)
12. consequences of child marriage on health and welfare. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
13. court's application of parens patriae jurisdiction. (Para 37 , 38)
14. conclusion affirming the original order and neha's status. (Para 39)
15. final decision and dismissal of the petition. (Para 40 , 41)

ORDER :

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer for issuance of a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of habeas corpus for the release of alleged detenue namely Neha wife of Harpreet Singh, resident of village Dhugga Kalan, Tehsil Garhiwala, District Hoshiarpur.

FACTS OF THE CASE

2. The petitioner herein is the real sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of one Harpreet Singh, aged 28 years son of Late Sh.Lashkar, resident of village Dugga Kalan, Tehsil Garhdiwala, District Hoshiarpur and has filed the present writ petition seeking writ in the nature of habeas corpus for release of one Neha, aged 16 years and 6 months who despite being below the age of 18 years married with aforesaid Harpreet Singh on 18.8.2020 in Prachin Pashupati Nath Shiv Mandir, MDC, Panchkula, as per the Hindu rites and rituals against the wishes of parents of Neha. Harpreet Singh belongs to Ad-dharmi caste which falls under SC category whereas Neha belongs to Lohar caste which falls under the backward category. The date of birth of Harpreet Singh is stated to be 18.1.1991 and is now about 30 years of age whereas date of birth of Neha is stated to be 6.4.2004 and is now a little less than 17 years of age. Both of them are governed by the Hindu Law.

3. Since the marriage was performed against the wishes of parents of the girl, she along with Harpreet Singh filed a criminal writ petition in this Court titled as “Neha and another Vs. State of Punjab and others” bearing CWP No.6587 of 2020 and the same was disposed of on 31.8.2020, vide Annexure P-4 with a direction to the police Authorities to decide the representation dated 19.8.2020 and to provide necessary protection in case the facts of the case is dictate. It was further made clear that the order was not a bar on initiation of any proceedings in accordance with law nor is it an expression of opinion regarding the validity or otherwise of the marriage.

4. However, before the aforesaid directions had been issued by this Court, an FIR No.0174 dated 8.8.2020, already stood registered against Harpreet Singh under Section 3 63 IPC vide Annexure P-5. Said Harpreet Singh thereafter, filed an application for anticipatory bail before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur, but since the FIR was under Section 3 63 IPC only which is a bailable offence, he withdrew the said application on 11.9.2020 vide Annexure P-7. Thereafter, father of Neha namely Karnail Singh (respondent No.6), made a supplementary statement to the police that his daughter has been enticed away by Harpreet Singh and therefore, offence under Section 3 66-A IPC was added in the FIR on 19.9.2020 vide Annexure P-8. As stated by the petitioner in paras 9 to 13 of the petition, both Harpreet Singh and Neha appeared before respondent No.2 i.e. the Senior S

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top