SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 108

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Maninder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ajay Arora, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This is a petition seeking directions to Superintendent of Police, Fazilka and SHO, Police Station Khuian Sarwar, Distt. Fazilka to provide adequate security and protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners.

3. Facts in brief are that petitioners have decided to marry each other but the parents of petitioner No.2 want to perform his marriage somewhere else. Petitioners are living in live in relations and there is a threat perception.

4. Learned State counsel appears on advance notice. On instructions from ASI Amrik Singh, submits that petitioner No.1 is minor and FIR No. 21, dated 28th February, 2021, under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC is registered at Police Station Khuian Sarwar, District Fazilka against the petitioner No.2. He further submits that the police has obtained the certificate regarding the date of birth from the school of petitioner No.1 and as per the said certificate she is minor.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon the Adhar Card annexed with the petition to submit that petitioner No.1 is major.

6. Suffice to say that the Adhar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top