MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Kulbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER :
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.
1. Petitioner is the existing stage carriage permit holder in terms of an approved Scheme, notified by the State of Haryana under Section 100 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act’) and plying his bus on the routes in question. His grievance is that private respondents have also been granted/issued impugned temporary permits on his route, but illegally, therefore, the same are liable to be set aside by this Court.
2. The prayer clause in nutshell is as under:-
(ii) to stay the operation of impugned permits (P-16 Colly.) and further restrained official respondents from issuing any time-table to operate buses on the routes in question;
(iii) to issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Court deems fit & proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
It is relevant to mention here that operation of the impugned permits was stayed and that is still
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.