Pulin Kumar vs State of Haryana - 2021 Supreme(P&H) 390

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(P&H) 390

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Pulin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shailender Singh Momi.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.S. Rai, Ms. Rubina Virmani, Mr. Rajinder Singh, Mr. Digvijay Singh, Ms. Kirti Singh, Mr. Manish Singla.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. For orders, see detailed order passed in CWP No. 32707/2019 titled as Vivek Tyagi vs. State of Haryana and Others of the even date.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2021 Supreme(P&H) 390

ANIL KSHETARPALPulin Kumar – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Pulin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent