IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Augustine George Masih, J.
Shakti Singh - Appellants
Vs.
State Information Commission, Haryana and Ors. - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 12016 of 2016
Decided On: 05-10-2018
RTI Act - Right to Information - Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969 - Section 17 - Section 22 of RTI Act - Official Secrets Act, 1923 - [Information Access, RTI Act, Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969, Section 17, Section 22] - The court discussed the applicability of the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) and the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. It emphasized that the RTI Act has an overriding effect over other statutes and laws, and information cannot be denied under the RTI Act merely because a statutory mechanism is prescribed under another Act. The court highlighted the fundamental right to information and the norm of disclosure under the RTI Act, emphasizing that information can only be denied if exempted under the provisions of the RTI Act itself.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a death certificate for his mother under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) after facing difficulties in obtaining the certificate through the prescribed procedure under the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969. The appeals filed by the petitioner were dismissed, leading to the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the RTI Act has an overriding effect over other statutes and laws, and information cannot be denied under the RTI Act merely because a statutory mechanism is prescribed under another Act. It emphasized the fundamental right to information and the norm of disclosure under the RTI Act.
Issues: Applicability of RTI Act and Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969 - Overriding effect of RTI Act - Denial of information under RTI Act
Ratio Decidendi: The RTI Act has an overriding effect over other statutes and laws, and information cannot be denied under the RTI Act merely because a statutory mechanism is prescribed under another Act. The fundamental right to information and the norm of disclosure under the RTI Act were emphasized.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the order passed by the State Information Commission was set aside. The case was remanded back to the Second Appellate Authority for a fresh decision as per the provisions of the RTI Act.
JUDGMENT :
Augustine George Masih, J.
1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 30.11.2015 (Annexure P-3) passed by the First Appellate Authority, Jhajjar, and me order dated 04.04.2016 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Second Appellate Authority, the State Information Commission, Haryana, whereby the appeals preferred by the petitioner have been dismissed.
2. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner had applied for the death certificate of his mother Rukmani in May 2015 to the Sub Registrar, Births and Deaths, Primary Health Centre, Mandothi (Jhajjar), to which a response was received on 19.05.2015 stating that the death certificate of Rukmani, mother of the petitioner, was not available. According to the petitioner, proper information was given to the Primary Health Centre, Mandothi, with regard to the death of the mother of the petitioner and was duly entered by Asha Worker Sumitra in the Primary Health Centre records. Faced with this situation, petitioner submitted an application on 03.08.2015 (Annexure P-1) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the RTI Act) to the State Public Information Officer-cum-Deputy Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar, Haryana-respondent No. 3 with required fee of ` 50/-, for which a receipt No. 6241 dated 03.08.2015 was issued. The said information when was not supplied within the time prescribed under the RTI Act, petitioner approached the First Appellate Authority namely Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar, Haryana-respondent No. 2 by filing an appeal on 17.09.2015 along with the application dated 03.08.2015. Said appeal was disposed of by the First Appellate Authority vide order dated 30.11.2015 (Annexure P-3) by observing that the information as sought by the petitioner has been supplied to him by the S.P.I.O. but no such information was ever supplied. The order of the First Appellate Authority indicates that the Deputy Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar, as well as the petitioner were not present at the time of hearing of the case despite various adjournments but the file was seen by the First Appellate Authority and on the basis of the record had simply passed the said order. Petitioner, therefore, preferred the second appeal before the State Information Commission, Haryana, on 08.12.2015, which was decided vide order dated 04.04.2016 (Annexure P-6) denying the information to the petitioner by observing that the petitioner is not entitled to information under the RTI Act and he should, in the light of the provisions of Section 17 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, seek the death certificate as per the procedure prescribed therein, despite taking into consideration the fact that the RTI Act has an overriding effect. This has led to the filing of the present writ petition.
3. I have heard the counsel for the parties and with their assistance, have gone through the impugned orders.
4. The operative portion of the order dated 04.04.2016 (Annexure P-6) passed by the State Information Commission, Haryana, reads as follows:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.