SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 473

SUVIR SEHGAL
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

SUVIR SEHGAL, J.

1. The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

2. Through the instant petition under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.157 dated 21.08.2020, registered under Sections 22(c), 27-A of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short “the NDPS Act”) at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, District Fatehabad.

3. FIR, Annexure P-1, was registered after a raid was conducted on the shop of Arvind @ Bablu, who was found in possession of 4800 Tramadol Hydrochloride Sustained Release Tablets Tricore SR and 2400 Tramadol Hydrochloride, Diclofenac Sodium Dicyclomine Hydrochloride & Chlorpheniramine Maleate Capsules Parvorine-Spas, total weighing 4 kilogram 854 grams. He named Satpal (present petitioner) Monu @ Shishpal, Rajesh @ Raja and Narinder as the persons, who had brought the contraband from Rajasthan and supplied it to him.

4. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused on the basis of statement of Arvind @ Bablu from whom recovery was allegedly effected. Placing reliance on case law, he urges that dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top