SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 475

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Krishna Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate,
For the Respondent: Mr. Randhir Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.134 dated 15.10.2020, under Sections 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Special Task Force, District STF Wing (PS Mohali) District Mohali.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and the recovery of contraband, if any, was from one Lakhwinder Kaur @ Lakho (wrongly typed as Sukhwinder Kaur in the body of the petition). He has submitted that so far as petitioner is concerned, she has been falsely implicated in the present case purely on the basis of disclosure statement made by the aforesaid co-accused namely Lakhwinder Kaur @ Lakho. He has submitted that there is no other evidence available with regard to the involvement of the petitioner apart from the disclosure statement. He has further submitted that said disclosure statement is not admissible in evidence as has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2021 (1) RCR (Crl.) 1.

3. H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top