SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 492

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Gurdeep Singh @ Kalu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Monika Jalota, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This is a second petition seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 0192, dated 11th August, 2020, under Section 354-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter 'IPC'] and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [hereinafter 'POCSO Act'] (Section 376DA of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act were added later on), registered at Police Station City-1, Abohar, District Fazilka.

3. F.I.R. was registered on the statement of victim (name withheld) aged 13 years. As per the FIR, on 10th August, 2020, victim went to purchase biscuits from the departmental shop of Sunil Kumar. When she went to shop, Sunil Kumar closed the gate and bolted the door from inside. He, with the bad intention, started touching upper parts of body of the victim. The victim raised alarm as a result Sunil Kumar ran away. The parents of victim were doing labour work. Initially due to fear, she did not disclose the incident but later on she narrated everything to her mother. She was taken to Civil Hospital and thereafter F.I.R. was registered. On the basis of supplementary st

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top