SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 537

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.
M/s Amrik Wines - Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others – Respondent
CWP No. 9432-2021
Decided On : 13-05-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Dharam Vir Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Harit Sharma Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Dhuriwala, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.

Recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was sustainable under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, despite the abolition of land revenue.

Headnote:

land revenue - Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Punjab Land Revenue (Abolition) Act, 1997 - Section 3(6), Section 3(7), Section 66, Section 67, Section 68, Section 79, Section 98 - The court discussed the recovery of arrears of land revenue under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and the Punjab Land Revenue (Abolition) Act, 1997. It rejected the contention that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was not maintainable after the abolition of land revenue. The court also addressed the issue of non-service of notices and orders, and the applicability of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 for recovery of dues. The court concluded that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was sustainable under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, and dismissed the petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the quashing of impugned orders and auction notices seeking to recover excise revenue as arrears of land revenue under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. The petitioner argued that recovery of the amount was not sustainable after the abolition of land revenue by the Punjab Land Revenue (Abolition) Act, 1997. The petitioner also raised concerns about non-service of notices and orders.

Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the contention that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was not maintainable after the abolition of land revenue. It also addressed the issue of non-service of notices and orders, and the applicability of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 for recovery of dues. The court concluded that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was sustainable under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, and dismissed the petition.

Issues: The issues included the sustainability of recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue after the abolition of land revenue, non-service of notices and orders, and the applicability of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 for recovery of dues.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was sustainable under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, despite the abolition of land revenue. The court also addressed the issue of non-service of notices and orders, and found that the notices and orders had been duly conveyed to the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, concluding that recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue was sustainable under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914.

JUDGMENT :

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

Case heard via video conferencing.

I. On 05.05.2021, the following detailed order had been passed by this court:-

“Case heard by video conferencing.

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of various writs in the nature of certiorari/mandamus/prohibition/or any other writ that this court deems proper in the given circumstances of the case, quashing the impugned orders dated 20.04.2017 and 10.09.2020 (copies Annexure P-5 and P-6 respectively), as also two auction notices (both dated 12.03.2021, copies Annexure P-7 and P-8), seeking to auction two properties of the petitioner to recover excise revenue to the tune of Rs.5,88,08,449/-.

2. Essentially, the ground raised in the petition, in respect of which even a question of law has been framed, is that the recovery of the aforesaid amount is sought to be made as an arrear of land revenue under the provisions of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887;

with land revenue itself, however, having been abolished by the State Government vide the Punjab Land Revenue (Abolition) Act, 1997 (Punjab Act No.8 of 1997), with the said Act essentially reading to the effect that with effect from the Rabi harvest of the agricultural year 1996-1997, the land revenue and additional land revenue payable under the provisions of the Act of 1887, shall be deemed to have been abolished.

The 2nd clause of the said Act (only the said two clauses having been reproduced in the writ petition), states that the provisions of the said Act, of 1997, would have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887.

3. Mr. Sharma, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, points to sub sections (6) and (7) of Section 3 of the Act of 1887, which reads as follows:-

    “3. Definition. In this Act, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context:-

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

(6) "land revenue" includes assigned land revenue and any sum payable in respect of land by way of quit-rent or of commutation for service to the Government or to a person to whom Government has assigned the right to receive the payment;

(7) "arrear of land revenue" means land revenue which remains unpaid after the date on which it becomes payable;

X X X X X X X X X X X X X.”

4. The contention therefore is that, with land revenue itself having been abolished, no demand notice under Section 68 of the Act of 1887 can be issued, and no proceedings under Sections 66 and 67 thereof can be taken; and consequently, the impugned orders, Annexures P-5 and P-6, having been issued under the provisions of Section 66 thereof and the impugned notices (Annexures P-7 and P-8), having been issued under the provisions of Section 79 thereof, none of them is sustainable.

5. The said provisions read as follows:-

    “Section 66. CERTIFIED ACCOUNT TO BE EVIDENCE AS TO ARREAR- A statement of account certified by a Revenue Officer shall be conclusive proof of the existence of an arrear of land revenue of its amount and of the person who is the defaulter.

Section 67. PROCESS FOR RECOVERY OF ARREARS: Subject to the other provisions of this Act an arrear of land revenue may be recovered by any one or more of the following processes, namely:-

(a) by service of writ of demand on the defaulter;

(b) by arrest and detention of his person;

(c) by distress movable property and uncut or ungathered crops; (d) by transfer of the holding in respect of which the arrear is due; (e) by attachment of the estate or holding in respect of which the arrear is due;

(f) by annulment of the assessment of that estate or holding;

(g) by sale of that estate or holding;

(h) by proceeding against other immovable property of the defaultler Section 68. WRIT OF DEMAND : A writ of demand may be issued by a Revenue Officer on or after the day following that in which an arrear of land revenue accrues.”

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

“Section 79. PROCLAMATION OF SALES-(1) On the receipt of the sanction of the Commissioner of the sale of a

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top