SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 561

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Mukesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Seema Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Rahul Deswal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The defendant is the appellant. She has filed an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram on 09.12.20219. Learned Additional District Judge has reversed the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court on 15.07.2016. The trial court had dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent for declaration that the Will dated 05.10.2011, allegedly executed by Late Sh. Chet Ram is illegal and fraudulent and the defendant-appellant be restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit property as also restrained her from alienating the suit property.

2. Before this Bench proceeds to discuss the facts of the case, it would be appropriate to draw a genealogical tree to understand the inter se relationship between the parties:-

 

Shiv Ram(Grandfather)

 

Chet Ram (Father)

Kiran Bala

 

Seema Rani

(plaintiff)

Suresh Kumar

 

 

Mukesh Rani

(appellant-defendant)

3. Seema Rani, daughter of Late Sh. Chet Ram filed the present suit a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top