RITU BAHRI, ARCHANA PURI
Smt. veena – Appellant
Versus
Shri Naveen – Respondent
ORDER
Archana Puri, J. - Challenge in the present appeal, is to the judgment dated 08.02.2017 passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Rohtak, whereby the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent-husband was allowed, on the ground of cruelty.
2. Background facts in nutshell are as follows:-
3. Respondent-petitioner Naveen had filed a petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, thereby alleging that his marriage with Veena (appellant) was solemnized on 23.02.2012 at village Karor, District Rohtak as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. From their wedlock, one son namely Ansh was born. After marriage, Naveen and his family members gave full love and affection to Veena. However, Veena is a lady of quarrelsome nature. Just after the marriage, the family members of Veena started interfering in their matrimonial life. Veena was not happy to live in the joint family of Naveen, in the village and started pressuring him to arrange separate accommodation at Rohtak, far away from his parents. When Naveen showed his inability to arrange separate accommodation, Veena became annoyed and started extending threat to implicate Naveen and his family members, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.