SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1573

RITU BAHRI, ARCHANA PURI
Smt. veena – Appellant
Versus
Shri Naveen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Archana Puri, J. - Challenge in the present appeal, is to the judgment dated 08.02.2017 passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Rohtak, whereby the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, filed by the respondent-husband was allowed, on the ground of cruelty.

2. Background facts in nutshell are as follows:-

3. Respondent-petitioner Naveen had filed a petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, thereby alleging that his marriage with Veena (appellant) was solemnized on 23.02.2012 at village Karor, District Rohtak as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. From their wedlock, one son namely Ansh was born. After marriage, Naveen and his family members gave full love and affection to Veena. However, Veena is a lady of quarrelsome nature. Just after the marriage, the family members of Veena started interfering in their matrimonial life. Veena was not happy to live in the joint family of Naveen, in the village and started pressuring him to arrange separate accommodation at Rohtak, far away from his parents. When Naveen showed his inability to arrange separate accommodation, Veena became annoyed and started extending threat to implicate Naveen and his family members, i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top