IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jaswant Singh, Vikas Bahl, JJ.
Love Garg & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. - Respondents
CWP-31198-2019 (O&M)
Decided On : 07-09-2021
SARFAESI Act - Transfer of Secured Asset - Sections 26(E), 35 - The court quashed the order requesting 'No Objection Certificate' from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chandigarh regarding the attachment of the plot. The judgment discussed the priority of secured creditors, the overriding effect of SARFAESI Act, and the protection of rights of auction purchasers. The court found that the attachment did not affect the rights of the auction purchasers and directed the transfer of the secured asset to the petitioners.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought the quashing of an order requesting a 'No Objection Certificate' from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chandigarh regarding the attachment of a plot. The petitioners also sought directions to transfer the secured asset in their favor, following an auction conducted under the SARFAESI Act. The property was sold to the petitioners in an auction conducted by the bank, and a Sale Certificate was issued, stating that the property was free from all encumbrances.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rights of the auction purchasers were not affected by the attachment and directed the transfer of the secured asset to the petitioners. The court held that the petitioners' right to property had been violated and allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and directing the transfer of the secured asset to the petitioners.
Issues: The issues involved in the case included the priority of secured creditors, the liability of auction purchasers to pay dues of the previous owner, and the refusal of the transfer of the property by the concerned authority.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the priority of secured creditors as per Sections 26(E) and 35 of the SARFAESI Act, the overriding effect of the Act over other laws, and the protection of rights of auction purchasers. The court also emphasized that the attachment did not affect the rights of the auction purchasers and directed the transfer of the secured asset to the petitioners.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the transfer of the secured asset to the petitioners. The court also disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications.
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. - The primary prayer in the present writ petition is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of order dated 16.05.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Estate Officer, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Limited-respondent No. 3, vide which respondent No. 3 had requested the Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda-respondent No. 4 as well as the petitioners to submit 'No Objection Certificate' from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chandigarh regarding the attachment of plot No. C-149, Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana in the matter of M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Limited v. M/s Vidya Cycle Industries.
2. Further prayer in the writ petition has been made for issuance of directions to the Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited (respondent No.2) and the Estate Officer, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited (respondent No. 3) to transfer the secured asset/plot No. C-149, Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana, in favour of the petitioners/auction purchasers in pursuance of the auction having taken place under the The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as "the SARFAESI Act").
3. The brief facts of the present case are that on 22.01.2013, M/s Durga Impex, availed Cash Credit Facility of Rs. 3,25,00,000/- from respondent No. 4-Bank and for the said facility, M/s Vidya Cycle Industries was the Guarantor and had mortgaged the plot No. C-149, Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana measuring 2083.33 square yards with the said bank. Further, vide letter dated 22.01.2013, respondent No. 4-Bank had requested the allotting agency i.e. respondent No.2 to mark lien on the Secured Assets. On 01.01.2015, loan account of M/s Durga Impex was declared as Non-Performing Asset and on 05.02.2019, respondent No. 4-Bank had issued a sale notice under Rule 8 Sub-Rule 6 read with Rule 9(1) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Rules of 2002") in the two newspapers i.e. Indian Express and Charhdikalan and fixed the date of auction as 28.02.2019 of the Secured Asset. On 28.02.2019, the auction was conducted by respondent No. 4-Bank in which the petitioners had made a bid of Rs. 1,99,25,000/- which was ultimately accepted. On 15.03.2019 a Sale Certificate (Annexure P-l at page 20 of paper book), was issued under Rule 9 Sub-Rule 6 of the Rules of 2002 in favour of the petitioners, conveying the title of the Secured Asset. Importantly, in the said Sale Certificate, it was specifically mentioned that the property/Secured Asset was being made free from all encumbrances. On 27.03.2019 (Annexure P-2 (Colly) at Page 23 of the paper book), respondent No. 4-Bank had requested the Estate Officer, Punjab State Industrial & Export Corporation, to transfer the Secured Asset in favour of the petitioners. A brief summary of the facts giving rise to the sale, was also mentioned in the said letter. On 28.03.2019 (Annexure P-2 at page 21 of the paper book), an application was moved by the petitioners to the Estate Officer, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited, Chandigarh for transferring the Secured Asset/plot in question in the name of the petitioners. The requisite affidavits as well as copies of Aadhaar Cards of the sellers and purchasers were annexed with the application. The transfer fee of Rs. 20,835/- by way of draft No. 232596 dated 28.03.2019 (page 26 of the paper book) was also submitted. On 16.05.2019 (Annexure P-3), the petitioners were surprised to receive a letter from the Estate Officer, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Limited-respondent No. 3, vide which respondent No. 4-Bank as well as the petitioners were requested to submit 'No Objection Certificate' from the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, with respect to some alleged attachment of the plot in question/Secured Asset. After receiving the said lette
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.