SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1503

H.S.MADAAN
Himanshu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Narula, Advocate for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. (Oral). - Case taken up through video conferencing.

This second petition for pre-arrest bail has been filed by petitioner Himanshu, an accused in FIR No.436 dated 06.10.2019, for offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 506 IPC (Sections 307 and 325 IPC added later on), registered with Police Station Ganaur, District Sonepat.

Briefly stated the prosecution story is that, on 05.10.2019 at about 8.30 PM in the area of Village Khijjar Pur, Ahir Majra, Sonepat within jurisdiction of Police Station Ganaur, accused Rambir carrying an iron pipe, his sons Himanshu (petitioner/accused) and Abhishek carrying bodkins (suas) along with their co-accused Babli and Sheetal had attacked Dharampal causing him injuries; Himanshu and Abhishek are said to have repeatedly attacked Dharampal causing him injuries on vital parts including on chest and back; keeping in view the nature of injuries to be grievous and dangerous to life, offences under Section 307 and 325 IPC were added later on.

Shakuntla @ Babli and Himanshu could not get the relief of pre-arrest bail from the Court of Sessions at Sonepat for offences under Sections 307 and 325 IPC; thereafter, they had approached thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top