SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jaishree Thakur, J.
Sukhchain Singh & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. - Respondents
CRM-M-15700-2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 17-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vinod K. Kaushal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Rashmi Attri, A.A.G., Punjab, Mr. Prashant Vashisht, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The restoration of peace and harmony through compromise and the futility of continuing criminal prosecution after an amicable settlement.

Headnote:

Compromise - Criminal Procedure - The court allowed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings based on the compromise between the parties, citing the restoration of peace and harmony and the futility of continuing criminal prosecution after an amicable settlement.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed seeking quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings based on a compromise between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition, considering the amicable settlement between the parties and the futility of continuing criminal prosecution.

Issues: Quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings based on compromise.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the offenses, the amicable settlement between the parties, and the futility of continuing criminal prosecution after a compromise.

Final Decision: The petition seeking quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings was allowed by the court.

JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J. (Oral). - This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No. 53 dated 17.11.2016 under Sections 363 and 366 of IPC (Sections 342 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act added later on) registered at Police Station Jhander, District Amritsar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising there from in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. The aforesaid FIR has been registered on the statement of complainant on the allegation of enticing his daughter on the pretext of marriage. Now with the intervention of respectable persons, the matter has been amicably compromised between the parties and they have resolved their disputes and differences.

3. Keeping in view the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, they were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in support of the compromise. In pursuance of the direction, a report has been received from Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board, Amritsar stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is with their own free will and volition and without any undue influence, threat, coercion and pressure.

4. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab on instructions from the Investigating Officer and learned counsel for the complainant/respondents No.2 and 3 admit the factum of compromise and the counsel for the respondent-State submits in case the parties have indeed settled their dispute, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

6. In a decision, based on compromise, none of the parties is a loser. Rather, a compromise not only brings peace and harmony between the parties to a dispute, but also restores tranquility in the society. After considering the nature of offences allegedly committed and the fact that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, continuance of criminal prosecution would be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak.

7. Consequently, keeping in view the fact that the dispute has been amicably settled and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466', this petition is allowed and FIR No. 53 dated 17.11.2016 under Sections 363 and 366 of IPC (Sections 342 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act added later on) registered at Police Station Jhander, District Amritsar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same are quashed qua petitioners.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top