SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1409

SUDHIR MITTAL
UCO Bank – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Bhanot – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate, Rishabh Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Mittal, J. - The petitioner-Bank is the defendant in the suit. It filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint which was allowed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Phagwara vide order dated 15.10.2018 (Annexure P-11). The plaintiffs preferred an appeal against the said order and the same was allowed by learned Additional District Judge, Kapurthala vide order dated 29.11.2019 (Annexure P-1). This order is under challenge in the revision petition.

2. Certain relevant facts need to be elucidated. The plaintiffs wanted to construct a hotel in their own property. They approached Punjab & Sind Bank, Phagwara Branch for a term loan of Rs.3.5 crores and the same was sanctioned vide letter dated 17.09.2010. In the year 2011, the plaintiffs entered into a collaboration agreement with Clarks Inn Group of Hotels and this led to plans for construction of a 3 Star hotel. This required additional funds and the plaintiffs contacted the petitioner-Bank for a loan of Rs.6.5 crores as the total projected requirement of funds was Rs.10 crores. Vide letter dated 05.08.2013, the loan was sanctioned. The sanction was based upon the willingness of Punjab & Sin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top