SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1417

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Dev Tewatia @ Debu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, Aakash Vashisth, Advocate, Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - Heard through video conferencing.

2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Sessions Judge, Faridabad dated 20.10.2020 and the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board dated 15.11.2019 whereby the application of the petitioner for his release on bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short, 'the Act') has been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is an accused in FIR No.679 dated 30.09.2019 under Section 302, 120-B, 201, 34 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sector 7, Faridabad. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The case of the prosecution is that co-accused Deepak had fired shots at the deceased-Sharwan. The petitioner has been arraigned as an accused on the statement of co-accused Puneet and Ajay @ Monu that the petitioner was sitting on the motorcycle outside the place of occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2019 and no recovery has been effected from him. He further contends that the Courts below have erroneously rejected the petition although in terms of Section 12 of the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top