SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1389

VIKAS BAHL
Som Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Gurdev Singh Kuka, Advocate for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral). - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for issuance of necessary and appropriate directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to investigate the matter on the applications moved by the petitioner (Annexures P-2 to P-7).

The case of the petitioner is that respondent No.4 is the wife of the petitioner and the said respondent No.4, in order to grab his property, got executed a gift deed of his plot and house in her favour. It is further the case of the petitioner that after the execution of the said gift deed, the behaviour of respondent No.4 towards the petitioner changed suddenly and that respondent No.4, in connivance with respondent No.5, threw out the petitioner from his home. The petitioner had made several representations which have been annexed as Annexures P-2 to P-7 with the present petition.

The complaints/representations (Annexures P-2 to P-5) are almost verbatimly same and have been given to various authorities including the Home Minister, Director General of Police, Haryana, Senior Superintendent of Police, Hansi, Hisar, SHO, City Hansi, Hisar. The prayer made in the said representations, which is common in all, is reprod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top