SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.
Shinda Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 11367 of 2021
Decided On : 10-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Deepak Gupta, Advocate, Dhruv Dayal, Advocate

The court considered the petitioner's physical disability, prolonged custody, and the potential delay in trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic as grounds for granting regular bail under the NDPS Act.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Regular Bail - The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, considering his physical disability, prolonged custody, and the likely delay in trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving the recovery of intoxicant tablets. The petitioner, who is physically challenged, had been in custody for over 7 months, and the trial was likely to be delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, emphasizing his physical disability, prolonged custody, and the potential delay in trial due to the pandemic. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's physical disability, prolonged custody, and the likely delay in trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's physical disability, prolonged custody, and the potential delay in trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic as grounds for granting regular bail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the instant petition and ordered the petitioner to be released on regular bail upon furnishing requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. The petitioner was also directed to provide his mobile number to the police station and keep his phone location on till the conclusion of the trial.

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No.02 dated 02.01.2021, under Sections 21, 22 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Moga, District Moga.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that 1040 loose intoxicant tablets containing Tramadol with a total weight of 412 grams were allegedly recovered from the petitioner. He further contends that the petitioner is polio affected and suffers from 98% disability in the lower limbs. A copy of the disability certificate is annexed as Annexure A-1 in CRM-11954-2021. He also contends that in June, 2020, the petitioner met with a road accident and had suffered multiple fracture on his body. Copy of the discharge summary and x-ray films are attached as Annexure P-2 and Annexure P-23 respectively in CRM-22261-2021.

3. Learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI Palwinder Singh, contends that challan has been filed but no prosecution witness has been examined. He has filed the affidavit of DSP City Moga, wherein report of the Medical Officer, Jail Hospital Faridkot has been appended which is reproduced hereunder:-

1. That the above said patient is last referred out to Civil Hospital-Faridkot on dated 23.06.2021. He was investigated through X-ray procedure and no fracture was detected. (Annexure 1 & 2).

2. That no operative procedure was ordered and he was prescribed routine oral pain killers and multivitamins.

3. That he reports of right hip pain, which probably is related to his deformed bodily structure due to polio of both thighs.

4. That his current medical condition needs to managed through non invasively through medicines and physiotherapy exercises, to improve his mobility."

4. Learned State counsel also contends that the petitioner was also involved in three other cases. He further contends that intoxicant tablets containing Tramadol with a total weight of 412 grams (approximate) was effected from the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that the petitioner had been acquitted in FIR No.136 while he was convicted in FIR No.41 and 51 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 1 months and 2 months respectively as the recovery was non-commercial quantity. These FIRs were registered in the year 2014 and thereafter, the health of the petitioner has deteriorated.

6. Heard.

7. In view of the above, especially when the petitioner is physically challenged, he is in custody for over 7 months, the COVID-19 pandemic and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I deem it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner.

8. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

9. Upon his release from Jail, the petitioner shall go to the police station Sadar Moga and shall furnish his mobile number to the SHO and keep location of his phone on till the conclusion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top