SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1366

RITU BAHRI, ARCHANA PURI
Shivani Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Amit Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Aman Priye Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral). - The appellant has come up in appeal against the order dated 09.07.2021 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram, whereby petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage by way of mutual consent, filed by the appellant and respondent, has been dismissed.

2. A perusal of the impugned order shows that marriage of the parties was solemnized on 15.02.2021 according to Hindu rites and rituals at village Garhi Bazipur, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurugram. After the marriage, they lived in House No.315/3, Uttam Nagar, Rewari. Soon after the marriage, differences cropped up between the couple and the appellant (Shivani Yadav) came back to her parental house realising that they could not live together. Ultimately, they filed a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 20.05.2021 seeking decree of divorce by way of mutual consent. Both the parties are living separately since 17.02.2021, as stated in their petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Along with the said petition, they also filed an application under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act with a prayer that mandatory period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top