SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 582

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Krishan Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral). - The instant petition has been filed under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to respondent No. 2 by the trial Court vide order dated 20.08.2020 (Annexure P-11) in case FIR No.304, dated 29.07.2020 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Kaithal, District Kaithal, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the learned trial Court gravely erred in granting concession of anticipatory bail to respondent No. 2-Poonam Maglani without appreciating that she alongwith other partners of the firm namely M/s Lekh Raj & Sons owed an amount of approximately Rs. 40.00 Crores to the commission agents including the petitioners and as and when they were asked to return their amount they were threatened with dire consequences by the accused including respondent No.2. He further contends that learned trial Court straightaway granted the anticipatory bail to respondent No. 2 without directing her to join investigation. Hence, a prayer has been made that the bail granted to respondent No. 2 be cancelled in view of the se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top