ALKA SARIN
Surlekha Rani @ Sulekha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Pardeep Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Alka Sarin, J. - Heard through video conferencing.
The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 10.03.2021 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sri Muktsar Sahib whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-respondent for permission to recall the witness PW-2, Shyam Sunder, for his re-examination has been allowed.
2. The brief facts relevant to the present case are that PW-2, Shyam Sunder son of Nand Lal, was examined in Court and he tendered his affidavit as Ex.PW-2/A in his examination-in-chief. In his examination-in-chief, PW-2 supported the version and contents of the plaint. Thereafter, his evidence was deferred for cross-examination to the next date. On the next date, he totally resiled from his examination-in-chief during cross-examination. When the cross-examination of said witness was completed, the counsel for the plaintiff-respondent requested for permission to re-examine the witness but counsel for the defendant-petitioner herein opposed the same on the ground that an application was required for the said purpose. Subsequently, an application (Annex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.