SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1261

ALKA SARIN
Surlekha Rani @ Sulekha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Pardeep Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aman Dhir, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. - Heard through video conferencing.

The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 10.03.2021 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sri Muktsar Sahib whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-respondent for permission to recall the witness PW-2, Shyam Sunder, for his re-examination has been allowed.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present case are that PW-2, Shyam Sunder son of Nand Lal, was examined in Court and he tendered his affidavit as Ex.PW-2/A in his examination-in-chief. In his examination-in-chief, PW-2 supported the version and contents of the plaint. Thereafter, his evidence was deferred for cross-examination to the next date. On the next date, he totally resiled from his examination-in-chief during cross-examination. When the cross-examination of said witness was completed, the counsel for the plaintiff-respondent requested for permission to re-examine the witness but counsel for the defendant-petitioner herein opposed the same on the ground that an application was required for the said purpose. Subsequently, an application (Annex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top