SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 598

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Sukhjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. (Oral). - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

2. Through the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 119 dated 01.08.2019, registered under Sections 325, 323, 34 IPC (later on Section 308 IPC was added and now again Section 304 IPC is added), at Police Station Sadar Faridkot, District Faridkot.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted regular bail by this Court, vide order dated 24.01.2020, but Section 304 IPC was added by the investigating agency on 01.08.2020 even after the presentation of the challan.

4. It is a case, in which Gursewak Singh (since deceased) was a Conductor with a bus bearing registration No. PB-13L-7107 and on 18.07.2019 in the bus itself, an argument took place between Gursewak Singh and petitioner-Sukhjit Singh, whereupon the petitioner had given a kick blow on his stomach and Gursewak Singh had fallen down from the bus and received multiple injuries on his head, due to which he had died. The petitioner had a suspicion that the deceased had illicit relations with his wife. Except for Section 304 IPC, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top