HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 316 dated 18.5.2020 under Sections 120-B, 302, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Sadar Karnal, District Karnal.
3. Reply by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karnal dated 15.7.2021, filed in the Registry, is taken on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he along with one Bhim Singh, pulled down Paramjit, brother of the complainant, from the tractor; that Bhim Singh has been declared innocent; that it is a case of version and cross-version and the issue as to which party was the aggressor one, is debatable; that the petitioner and his brother also suffered injuries in the occurrence and the petitioner has been in custody since 25.5.2020.
5. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and has not disputed the custody period of the petitioner i.e. one year and two months. He further submits that charges have been framed but no prosecution witness has been examined till date.
6. I have hear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.