SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 593

FATEH DEEP SINGH
Mohit – Appellant
Versus
Pooja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral). - In this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner husband Mohit has sought quashment of the orders dated 2.8.2019 Annexure P/14 passed by the learned Family Court, Kurukshetra whereby the court had issued conditional warrants of arrest against the petitioner-husband.

2. Upon hearing arguments of the two sides and perusal of the records.

3. It is undisputedly well writ large on the records that Mohit and Pooja are husband and wife who had fallen apart. It is during the course of events, the wife preferred an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and in which she also sought a prayer through separate application for grant of interim maintenance during the pendency of the main petition. The court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kurukshetra allowed a sum of Rs 5000/- per month to the wife. However, upon revision, by the wife over insufficiency of this amount, the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra vide orders dated 19.4.2018 enhanced the maintenance to Rs 30,000/- per month. When the husband failed to pay the maintenance arrears in spite of repeated orders by the court led to passing of impugned order dated 2.8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top