The court has the discretion to grant permission to travel abroad while facing trial, and may impose conditions to ensure the individual's return.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. - Prayer in this petition is for granting permission to the petitioner to go abroad, who is facing trial in case FIR No. 235 dated 27.11.2017 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC at Police Station Jamalpur, District Ludhiana, w.e.f. 01.08.2021 till 31.01.2022.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon order dated 03.02.2020 passed in CRM-M-2431-2020 (Annexure P-8) to submit that even on an earlier occasion, the petitioner has been granted permission to travel abroad and after availing the said concession, he has returned back well within the time and has never misused the same. The operative part of the said order reads as under:

"Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a petition i.e. CRM-M-19285- 2018, praying for quashing of the aforesaid FIR, in which the following order has been passed on 07.05.2018:-

"Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.235 dated 27.11.2017 under Sections 406 & 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Jamalpur, District Ludhiana and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR has been registered on two grounds; first that petitioner No.1 has entered into an agreement to purchase 07 kanals of land from Jasbir Kaur, who is his real sister, vide agreement to sell dated 13.02.2014. Later on, the complainant Hardeep Singh purchased the said land vide sale deed dated 02.05.2016. It is further submitted that thereafter, petitioner No.2 had filed a suit for specific performance on the basis of aforesaid agreement to sell, however, the matter was compromised between petitioner No.2 and Jasbir Kaur vide compromise dated 01.12.2017 (Annexure P4) and on the basis of this compromise, the suit filed by petitioner No.2 was decided by the Lok Adalat at Ludhiana and petitioner No.2 had withdrawn the suit in view of the compromise on 09.12.2017. It is also submitted that as per the compromise between petitioner No.2 and Jasbir Kaur, sale deed dated 02.05.2016 executed in favour of respondent No.2-complainant Hardeep Singh was kept intact and therefore, no offence under Section 420 IPC is made out.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners further submits that second ground for registration of the FIR is with regard to a dispute of passage regarding which there was a settlement between petitioner No.1 and complainant Hardeep Singh that they will leave this passage out of the joint land as there is no partition by metes and bound. Learned senior counsel has referred to operative part of the FIR, where the inquiry officer has held that while doing the spot inspection, petitioner No.1 has not objected regarding use of the passage, which was left in the settlement and the complainant Hardeep Singh could not produce any document in respect of the passage, which he claimed to have purchased from Gurwinder Singh and another. It is further submitted that even in the earlier inquiry, it was found that the matter is of civil nature and no offence is made out.

Notice of motion for 13.09.2018.

Notice re: stay also.

The Investigating Officer is directed to file a specific affidavit with regard to the inquiries conducted by the police before registration of the FIR holding that the dispute is of civil nature and how opinion was formed to register the present FIR."

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submits that the said petition is now pending for 25.02.2020. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a green card holder and he came to India for managing his properties and he was involved in the present litigation. It is also submitted that the petitioner has moved an application before the trial Court for seeking permission to travel abroad from 25.12.2019 till 27.03.2020, however, the said application was dismissed vide impugned order dated 14.01.2020.

Learned senior counsel has argued that the only reason giv