ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Harpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. - CRM-19303-2021
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the applicant/complainant is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the present petition.
CRM-19302-2021
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and amended memo of parties and reply filed by respondent No.2-complainant are taken on record.
CRM-19299-2021
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and respondent No.2-complainant is exempted from filing certified/true typed copies of Annexures R-2/1 to R-2/3 and photocopies of the same are taken on record.
CRM-M-12193-2021
4. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.80 dated 06.07.2020 registered under Sections 353, 186, 323, 506, 427, 148 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') in Police Station Badali Ala Singh, District Fatehgarh Sahib to which Sections 332 and 308 of the IPC were added lateron (offence under Section 308 of the IPC held not made out vide order dated 24.02.2021).
5. While issui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.