SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1199

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Sudesh Kumar Sood – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate, Vishal Mehta, Advocate, Mehardeep Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. - The present petition has been filed seeking interest on the delayed release of the pensionary benefits of the petitioner. The challenge in the present writ petition is also to the order dated 24.03.2017 (Annexure P/9), by which the said claim of the petitioner for the grant of interest on the delayed release of the pensionary benefits has been rejected by the respondent-Corporation.

2. As per the facts in the present writ petition, the petitioner retired from service on 30.06.2015 after attaining the age of 60 years after availing two years extension in his service. While the petitioner was in service, an enquiry was being conducted against the colleague of the petitioner in respect of the charge-sheet dated 11.06.2013 and during the enquiry proceedings, the name of the petitioner also cropped for having committed certain lapses and on the basis of the same, the respondentCorporation decided to charge sheet the petitioner vide order dated 04.01.2016.

3. Before the charge sheet could be issued to the petitioner, the petitioner filed representation with the respondent-Corporation accepting his guilt and prayed for sympathetic view and keeping in view

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top