RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Parmod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.657 dated 28.11.2017 registered under Sections 23, 25, 4, 5(2) Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse)Act 1994, (In Short PNDT Act, 1994), 15(2)(B) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (In Short IMC Act, 1956) and 420 IPC (Challan presented under Section 4(4), 5(2), 23, 25 of PC&PNDT Act, 1994, Section 15(2)(3) of the IMC Act, 1956 and Section 419, 420, 120-B of IPC) at Police Station city Mahendargarh.
3. On 09.04.2021, following order was passed by this Court:-
"The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the FIR is silent with regard to the role of the petitioner. The petitioner was nominated in the second disclosure statement of Sunil Kumar, who was arrested. It has been alleged that the petitioner was actively involved in the entire process and has also received an amount of Rs.4,000/-. The reply of the State further indicated that although out of total amount of Rs.24,000/-, an amount of Rs.20,000/- could be recover
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.