SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1192

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Anu Garg @ Anu Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sunil K Sharma, Advocate for the UOI.

ORDER

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - The hearing of the case was held through videoconferencing on account of restricted functioning of the Courts.

1. By this order, three civil writ petitions i.e CWP-10182-2021, 10184-2021 and 10187-2021 shall stand disposed of.

2. The relief sought in these three writ petitions is identical. Learned counsel representing the petitioner in all the three writ petitions is same and states that these writ petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common order.

3. For convenience, the facts are being noticed from CWP-10182-2021. The petitioners in the various writ petitions were owners of various pieces of land, which were acquired by the Central Government under the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1956'). After the competent authority had determined the amount of compensation for the land acquired, they applied to the Central Government for appointment of an Arbitrator as the compensation determined by the competent authority was not acceptable. The Arbitrator was not only appointed but on 28.10.2010 the award has already been passed. The petitioners pray for a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top