SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1146

SUDHIR MITTAL
Sanjay @ Sanju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate, Upasana Dhawan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Mittal, J. - CRM-19376-2021

This application has been filed for placing on record a copy of the challan as Annexure P-6.

2. For the reasons stated therein, application is allowed and Annexure P-6 is taken on record.

CRM-M-43180-2020

3. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.540 dated 25.11.2019, registered at Police Station Civil Line Kaithal, District Kaithal under Section 307, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. According to the FIR, a shot was fired at the car of the complainant whereupon the Police was informed. Before the Police could be informed, the brother of the complainant received phone call from one Sandeep Chatha enquiring about the incident. Since, nobody had been told about the incident, suspicion arose upon said Sandeep Chatha and another person named Lucky Verma. Challan dated 23.11.2020 was submitted wherein, the petitioner has been named as an accused on the basis of a disclosure statement.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not named in the FIR. Even in the challan, his implication is only on the basis of disclosure statement. Thus, there is no evidence on record to indicate the involvement of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top