SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1103

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Ajay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate, H.S. Sitta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 234 dated 6.12.2020 under Sections 307, 379-B, 353, 186, 188, 148, 149, 34 IPC, Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, registered at Police Station Dharmkot, District Moga.

3. Custody certificate by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent(S), Central Prison, Faridkot has been filed through e-mail. Copy of the same is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been nominated in the present FIR on 08.12.2020; that neither any role has been attributed to the petitioner nor he was present at the spot when the alleged occurrence took place; that the petitioner has been in custody for the last 61/2 months; and that no other case is pending against him.

5. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner and the other co-accused and that the challan has been presented in this case.

6. As per the custody certificate, the petitioner has been in custody for the last 06 months and 15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top