ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Sumit Tanwar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 208 dated 14.07.2020 under Sections 395 and 34 of the IPC (Section 379-A was deleted and Section 395 added later on), registered at Police Station Sector-56, Gurugram, Haryana.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset has referred to the order dated 01.06.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugarm to submit that the order is totally non-speaking reflecting non-application of mind and lacking the art of writing an order. For a reference the entire order is reproduced below:
"This bail application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 is filed by applicant-accused in case arising out of FIR No.208 dated 14.07.2020, under Section 395 IPC, Police Station Sector 56, Gurugram.
2. Notice of bail application was issued to the respondent-State. Reply filed and perused.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant-accused has argued that the applicant-accused has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further contended that the entire story of the prosecution is concocted and fabricated. In the end, a prayer for granting anticipator
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.