SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1095

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Pippal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arshdeep Singh Bawa, Advocate, Dhruv Dayal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - Heard through video conferencing.

2. The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 58 dated 30.03.2020, under Sections 307, 323, 186, 353, 188, 269, 270, 341, 148, 149 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that it is alleged that an altercation took place between the villagers and the police with regard to setting up barricade to prevent the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. He, however, contends that simple injuries were caused on both sides. He also contends that the petitioner had earlier been granted ad interim bail and had joined investigation. The petitioner was declared innocent by the police and consequently the previous application, i.e. CRM-M No.30412 of 2020, for anticipatory bail had been withdrawn on 13.01.2021. He further contends that co-accused, Satpal Singh @ Satta Singh, Gurdev Singh and Bagicha Singh have been granted anticipatory bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.

4. This Court, by order dated 28.04.2021 had directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer and join the investigation and in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top