IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.
Maya Kaur - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M No. 2994 of 2021
Decided On : 07-07-2021
NDPS Act - Anticipatory Bail - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under the NDPS Act based on the petitioner's non-involvement in any other case under the NDPS Act, the non-commercial quantity of the recovered substance, and the petitioner's acquittal in previous cases.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under the NDPS Act for the recovery of tablets from her husband. The petitioner had joined the investigation and was not wanted in any other case under the NDPS Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court accepted the petition and made the interim directions absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer.
Issues: Anticipatory bail under the NDPS Act
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's non-involvement in any other case under the NDPS Act, the non-commercial quantity of the recovered substance, and the petitioner's acquittal in previous cases as grounds for granting anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under the NDPS Act, subject to certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. - The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered against her vide FIR No.276 dated 03.10.2020 at Police Station Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur, under Sections 22/29 of the NDPS Act.
2. At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 10.03.2021, the following order was passed:
"Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.276 dated 03.10.2020 under Sections 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur. As per allegations in the FIR, 300 tablets of CLOVIDOL-100-SR (Tramadol Hydrochloride) were recovered from Paramjit Singh @ Pammi-husband of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner is alleged to have surfaced in the disclosure statement of said Paramjit Singh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the recovery is of non-commercial quantity. Though the petitioner was earlier involved in cases registered under Section 379 IPC, but she has been acquitted in both the cases of the charges. There is no other case under the NDPS Act registered against the petitioner. Notice of motion for 07.07.2021.
xx xx"
3. Learned State counsel upon instructions has informed that pursuant to interim directions issued by this Court, the petitioner has since joined investigation and that the petitioner is not involved in any other case under NDPS Act.
4. In view of the aforestated position, wherein the petitioner was not arrested at the spot nor any recovery was effected from her and while also noticing that she has already joined investigation and is not wanted in any other case under NDPS Act, the petition is accepted and the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 are hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.