SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 966

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Bluecraft Agro Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Suresh K. Jindal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Through this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-

"(ii) Issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned memo dated 11.06.2019-Annexure P-12 issued by respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Officer (Civil)-cum-Collector, Jagadhri;

(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the stamp duty ofRs.7,30,73,460/- purchased by the petitioner from the Government Treasury on 23.02.2018 and for which, E-Stamp paper was issued on 26.02.2018 along with interest as may be assessed by this Hon'ble Court."

2. The petitioner-company claims that it was to get scribed a sale deed in order to purchase of 54 Bighas and 7 Biswas of land along with the constructed area situated at village Mamida, District Yamuna Nagar. For that purpose, the petitioner-company is alleged to have purchased Non-Judicial E-Stamp papers worth Rs.7,30,73,460/- from the Government Treasury on 26.02.2018. In paragraph 5 of the writ petition, it has pleaded as under:-

"5. That after purchase of the E-Stamp paper on 26.02.2018, it transpired to the petitioner that as per the Circular of the Haryana Government regarding fixation of collector

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top