SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 956

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Balraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Banwari Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant

ORDER

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. - The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for setting aside the order dated 19.03.2021 which has been passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hisar vide which an application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. A brief factual metric of the case would be necessary before considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The respondent/plaintiff (Banwari Lal) filed a suit for declaration to the effect that plaintiff is sole and exclusive owner in possession with respect to the property given in the head note of the plaint which has been annexed with the present petition as Annexure P-l. It has been stated in the plaint that the plaintiff had filed a suit for injunction against Balraj Singh and others because they had tried to forcibly take the possession and the Court had ordered to file a suit for the partition of the land in question because the land of the plaintiff and Balraj Singh and others fall under the same khasra nu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top