SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 942

LISA GILL
Sukhdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Avinash Mohindru – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sharad Mehra, Advocate, Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDERORDER

Lisa Gill, J. - Petitioners/plaintiffs seek setting aside of order dated 05.03.2020 (Annexure P-4), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Amritsar, whereby petitioners have been directed to cross-examine DW9-Kanav Khanna prior to cross-examination by the other defendants.

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of this matter are that petitioners herein have filed a civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Petitioners seek a declaration to the effect that they are owners of the suit property as described in the plaint by virtue of two registered sale deeds and on the basis of mutations sanctioned thereafter. It is pleaded that the property in question had been purchased by plaintiffs from one Smt.Usha. Defendants/respondents no.2 to 4 are pleaded to be tenants in the suit property, the tenancy being created by Purshottam Dass as proprietor of M/s. Ravi Dyeing and Printing and Finishing Works. After death of Purshottam Dass, Smt. Usha is stated to have inherited the property and become its lawful owner.

3. Written statement on behalf of defendant no.1 Avinash Mohindru and defendant no.5 Sudarshan Sewa Trust through its Chairman Avinash Mohindru was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top