SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 894

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Pawan @ Bhola – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.D. Sehra, Advocate, Anmol Malik, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudip Ahluwalia, J. - This revision petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 09.05.2019, passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Faridabad, vide which the appeal preferred on behalf of the petitioner, who is a juvenile, against the previous order dated 20.04.2019, passed by the Ld. Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Faridabad, seeking release of the petitioner on bail, were dismissed.

2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner would have been entitled to bail automatically under Section 12(1) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short 'the Act'), and the only circumstance to deny such bail could have been covered by the Proviso to Section 12(1) of the Act, which is set out as below:

"...Provided that such person shall not be so released if there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring that person into association with any known criminal or expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger or the person's release would defeat the ends of justice, and the Board shall record the reasons for denying the bail and circumstances that led to such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top