SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 896

RAJAN GUPTA, KARAMJIT SINGH
Sudesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikram Singh, Advocate, Aman Bahri, Advocate, A.G. Haryana, Advocate, Vinod K Kanwal, Advocate, Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Karamjit Singh, J. - Case has been heard through video conferencing on account of COVID-19 Pandemic.

2. The respondent No.6-Bharat Bhushan filed an ejectment petition against the petitioners and respondent No.7 under Section 7 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (for short 'Act of 1961') on 21.7.2016 (Anneuxre P-2). The petitioners submitted reply (Annexure P-4) thereto. After adjudicating upon the controversy, the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Indri, by his order dated 12.2.2018 (Annexure P-5) allowed the petition and gave directions that the petitioners and other encroachers be ejected from the land bearing Khasra No.26//14, 23/2 and 47.

3. Aggrieved by the order passed by Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Indri dated 12.2.2018 (Annexure P-5), the petitioners preferred an appeal before the Collector, Karnal. The aforesaid appeal was dismissed by the Collector, Karnal, after hearing both the parties, vide order dated 22.10.2018 (Annexure P-7). The petitioners being dissatisfied with the said two orders i.e. Anneuxre P-5 and Anneuxre P-7, filed a revision petition impugning the same before the Commissioner, Karnal Division, Karnal. The revision petition fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top