SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 884

JAISHREE THAKUR
Aarti Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sunit Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anuj Balian, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J. - The instant criminal revision has been filed by the petitioners seeking to challenge the order dated 12.10.2016 passed by the Family Court, Ambala whereby, petitioner No. 1-wife has been allowed maintenance @ Rs. 2000/- per month from the date of filing of the petition till the period she remained out of job whereas, petitioner No.2-minor son has been allowed maintenance @ Rs. 2000/- per month from the date of filing of the petition, on the ground that the same is meager and insufficient.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that a marriage was solemnized between petitioner No. 1-Aarti Gupta and respondent-Sunit Kumar, out of which wedlock petitioner No.2-minor child was born. On account of differences that arose between the parties to the marriage, they started residing separately and a petition claiming maintenance was filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the wife for herself as well as on behalf of the minor child, aged 06 years in the year 2013. It was alleged that petitioner No.1-wife was doing a job of Guest Teacher and was not earning sufficiently to support herself and the minor child whereas, respondent-husband, who was a Chartered Accountant b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top