SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 875

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Lochan Dass – Appellant
Versus
Deepa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Matya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill , J. - The present application under Section 114 CPC has been filed for review of the order dated 04.11.2020 passed by this Court, vide which the above-captioned civil revision was dismissed as not maintainable.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the civil revision dismissed by this Court as not maintainable, was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, whereas the judgment in Pritam Singh and another Vs. Sunder Lal and others,1990 98 PunLR 1991, referred to in the dismissal order, was passed in a petition filed under Section 115 CPC. It is further contended that as the powers enjoined with this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution are wide, the judgment in Pritam Singh's case (supra), will have no applicability in the case in hand. Rather, he relies upon the judgments of the Coordinate Benches of this Court, in Brijlal Vs. Sajjan Singh and others,2019 3 RCR(Civ) 845; CR No.235-2015, titled as Banarsi Das Vs. Sardha Ram and others, decided on 14.09.2015; CR1 of 3 6504-2018 titled as Raj Kumar Vs. Tarlok Singh and others, decided on 18.01.2019 and CR-935-2018 titled as Tejbir and others Vs. Deep Chand, decided on 29.05.2019

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top