SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 872

ALKA SARIN
Ram Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Jagdeep Singh Ghangas – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arun Singal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Alka Sarin, J. - Heard through physical hearing.

2. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 14.01.2020 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for rejection of the ejectment petition filed by the respondent.

3. The facts relevant to the present Us are that in September 2018 the respondent filed an ejectment petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 for eviction of the petitioner from Shop No. 13, part of land measuring 3 Biswas i.e. 150square yards comprised in Khewat No. 1086 Khatoni No. 1513, Khasra Nos.3585/16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29 situated in Parti Rajputan within the limits of Municipal Corporation No. 5092, Panipat, known as Gandhi Mandi, Panipat. The respondent claimed himself as landlord and sought the eviction of the petitioner (tenant) inter-alia on the grounds of arrears of rent, personal necessity for running Advocate's office as also on the ground that the shop in question was more than 60 years old and the petitioner was not keeping it clean and never cared for whit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top