SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 827

ALKA SARIN
Ranbir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr. Minderjeet Yadav, DAG, Haryana, for the Respondent.

ORDER

Alka Sarin, J. - Heard through video conferencing.

2. The present civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed inter-alia for issuance of a writ in the nature certiorari to set aside the impugned oral order dated 09.09.2020 regarding relieving of the petitioner by respondent Nos.3 and 4 and thereafter replacing him with private respondent No.6 on the post of Mali.

3. The brief facts, relevant to the present Us, are that the State Government has a policy for outsourcing of services/activities. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are service/manpower providers. Since 01.01.2016 the petitioner is working as a Mali with respondent No.3 through respondent No.4 (the service/manpower provider). As per the averments in the writ petition, during this period the petitioner was asked to do other jobs by respondent No.3 like waterman, tube-well operator, night guard, support staff during examinations, etc. According to the petitioner, the respondentNo.4 (the service/manpower provider) did not pay/deposit the EPF of the petitioner and other similarly situated persons despite demand having been made. In 2017 respondent No.3 changed the service/manpower provider and gav

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top