SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 779

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Manoj Rohila – Appellant
Versus
Aman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri. J. (Oral) - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer for quashing the impugned order dated 14.9.2018 (Annexure P-3), passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jind, as well as order judgment dated 6.1.2020 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, in criminal revision petition.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by the children of the petitioner namely Aman aged 11 years and Nitika aged 12 years through their mother Neelam who is stated to have taken divorce from the petitioner. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jind, had fixed the maintenance @ Rs.10,000/- per month i.e. Rs.5,000/- per month for each child of the petitioner. Thereafter, revision petitions were preferred by the children of the petitioner as well as by the petitioner and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, vide order dated 6.1.2020 (Annexure P-4), dismissed both the petitions.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that maintenance for the minor children @ Rs.5,000/- per month is exces

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top