SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 768

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Raj Kumar Nanda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Sunint Kaur, AAG, Punjab, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral). - The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking promotion to the post of District Revenue Officer with effect from the date, the person junior to him was promoted. The claim of the petitioner has been declined by the respondents vide impugned order dated 04.11.2020 (Annexure P/10). The said order is under challenge before this Court in the present writ petition.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner was charge-sheeted in the year 2008 in respect of certain allegations and on the basis of the said charge sheet, he was dismissed from service on 07.05.2012. The said order of dismissal was challenged by the petitioner by way of filing of CWP No. 11011 of 2012. When the petitioner was out of service, an employee namely, Smt. Paramjit Kaur Sandhu was promoted as District Revenue Officer vide order dated 03.02.2011 but, the said order was never executed as Smt. Paramjit Kaur Sandhu was on leave. Before the promotion order of Smt. Paramjit Kaur Sandhu dated 03.02.2011 could be implemented, same was cancelled on 18.06.2013. It was only on 16.10.2014, the said Smt Paramjit Kaur Sandhu was again promoted prospect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top