SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 735

SANJAY KUMAR, ARCHANA PURI
Vishaldeep – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Pathankot, – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar, J. (Oral). - The petitioners assail the initiation of proceedings against them by the Hindu Co-operative Bank Limited, Pathankot, the third respondent, under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, 'the Act of 2002'), and more particularly, the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by the District Magistrate, Pathankot, in exercise of power under Section 14 of the Act of 2002 for taking over physical possession of their mortgaged property.

2. Be it noted that the petitioners approached this Court earlier, by way of CWP No.22167 of 2020, in relation to this very cause of action and the said writ petition was dismissed by order dated 21.12.2020, relegating them to the statutory remedy available under the Act of 2002. Pursuant thereto, the petitioners approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh, by way of an application filed under Section 17 of the Act of 2002, which was numbered as SA/1/2021.

3. However, by the impugned order dated 04.01.2021, the Tribunal dismissed the said application on the ground that it was premature. Perusal of the order reflects that the Tribunal was of the opi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top