ANIL KSHETARPAL
Rehra Ram – Appellant
Versus
Nitish – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. - By this order, Regular Second Appeals No. 4060 of 2004, 4622 &3O18 and Civil Writ Petition No. 17617 of 2014 shall stand disposed of.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that all these three cases can be conveniently disposed of by a common order.
3. After having heard learned counsel for the parties at length, this Court has come to a conclusion that the dispute in Regular Second Appeal No. 4060 of 2004 is required to be remitted back to the trial Court for decision afresh. Hence, the detailed facts which have already been noted by the Courts below are not being repeated. Suffice to note that the plaintiffs-Rehra Ram and Others filed a suit with the following prayer:
"30. It is, therefore, prayed that a decree for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs are owners in possession of the suit land, as per their respective shares, as mentioned in the head note of the plaint, situated in village Liwalwali, Tehsil & Disttt. Sirsa, and the entries in the revenue records showing the contrary to it are wrong and are liable to be corrected in the names of the plaintiffs as per their respective shares, and the transfers made by Shri Het Ram in favo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.