SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 711

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Shiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. - (The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C) for setting aside the impugned order dated 14.05.2020 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Karnal whereby order dated 03.04.2020 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Assandh granting default bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.689 dated 15.08.2018 registered under Sections 193, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC) in Police Station Assandh, District Karnal was set aside.

2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the filing of the present petition are that complainant-Ramphal filed complaint before learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Assandh regarding filing of forged documents by the accused in their defence evidence in criminal cases mentioned therein and his criminal intimidation by the accused on24.09.2017 at about 9 a.m. when he was going towards Bus Stand, Kurlan. In compliance with order passed under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. on the above-said complaint, the above-said F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top